Dynamic Capabilities And Strategic Management Teece Pdf

dynamic capabilities and strategic management teece pdf

File Name: dynamic capabilities and strategic management teece .zip
Size: 29793Kb
Published: 09.11.2020

The system can't perform the operation now. Try again later. Citations per year.

Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Dynamic Capabilities

The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge JIK focuses on how we gain knowledge through innovation and how knowledge encourages new forms of innovation. Not all innovation leads to knowledge. Only enduring innovation that can be generalized across multiple fields creates theory and knowledge.

JIK welcomes papers on innovations that improve the quality of knowledge or that can be used to develop knowledge. Innovation is a broad concept, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, antecedents, and behaviors at the organizational level in the private and public sectors as well as at the individual, national, and professional levels.

JIK articles explore knowledge-related changes that introduce or encourage innovation to promote best practices within society. JIK provides an outlet for high-quality studies that have undergone double-blind peer review. In doing so, JIK ensures that such studies reach a global readership of scholars, consultants, practitioners, international leaders, and policymakers who recognize the importance of innovation and knowledge as economic drivers and who base their decisions on new ideas and findings in innovation and knowledge.

JIK publishes content in the form of theoretical articles, empirical studies employing quantitative or qualitative methods, practice-oriented papers, teaching-oriented papers, case studies, book reviews, conference reports, short articles on current trends in science and society, abstracts of recent innovation and knowledge PhDs, and shorter opinion-based and review articles, commentaries, and debates. JIK publishes state-of-the-art research on emerging topics in the world of innovation and knowledge and appeals to a broad readership.

The editors welcome suggestions for special issue topics. JIK articles should demonstrate contextual differences, while highlighting lessons for the wider audience. In sum, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge in a range of fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.

JIK has a broad scope to the following areas: 1. Innovation including but not limited to: open innovation, innovation adoption and diffusion, organizational behavior and innovation, creativity, improvisation, and individual innovation, innovation in teams and groups, institutional and social innovation, consequences of innovation, critical approaches to innovation or innovation alliances and networks in relation to knowledge, and vice versa.

Knowledge patterns in relation to innovation. Knowledge-related changes that introduce innovations and best practices in society. Globalization in innovation and knowledge. Innovation policies and practices that lead to knowledge. Cross-cultural case studies in knowledge and innovation. New practical models and paradigms for understanding and fostering innovation and knowledge. Knowledge and innovation derived from data. Information systems in knowledge and innovation.

Knowledge and innovation in organizations and their behaviors. Knowledge- and innovation-based systems, products, and processes. Issues that affect the developers of education systems and educators who implement and manage innovations and knowledge.

Ethics in knowledge and innovation. Knowledge and innovation transfer. Quality in knowledge and innovation. Dynamic capabilities remain one of the most popular, but also one of the most controversial topics in current knowledge and innovation research. This study exposes strengths and weaknesses of existing conceptualizations of dynamic capabilities by using a systems theoretic lens.

Systems theory suggests that organizations operate in environments they cannot fully understand. Thus, organizational action patterns inevitably involve simplification, selectivity and uncertainty leading to inherent blind spots in every kind of strategic action.

As the resulting insight, fully flexible organizational capabilities might not be achievable and continuous adaptation to every kind of environmental change cannot be possible from a systems theoretic perspective. Accordingly, this work discusses empirical difficulties that derive from the preceding argumentation and outlines a corresponding re-conceptualization of the dynamic capabilities concept..

Since the two seminal works by Teece, Pisano, and Shuen and Eisenhardt and Martin dynamic capabilities became and remained a central research area on knowledge and innovation. Bibliographic reviews e. To divide this variety of conceptualizations into groups, a classification along the lines of a distinctive desirable outcome, that is successful adaptation to environmental changes or the achievement of competitive advantage, appears to be useful. The initial intent of Teece et al.

However, only some of the existing research today follows this assumption. This paper therefore divides between conceptualizations that include a distinct outcome, and those that do not. The group that argues for a distinctive outcome consists of two further subgroups, that either argue for sustainability or not.

Like Teece et al. Further definitions that might as well fit here are for example those by Griffith and Harvey and Lee, Lee, and Rho This study refers to those definitions in the following as group 1a. Conceptualizations that slightly relax the assumptions of competitive advantage, but still contain an outcome component belong to the second subgroup, that this study calls group 1b.

Eisenhardt and Martin , p. Contrary to Teece et al. Nonetheless, Eisenhardt and Martin's definition still ties dynamic capabilities to the achievement of an outcome, namely matching or creating market change.

Independent of the very type, the involvement of a successful outcome in the definition of dynamic capabilities might make the concept tautological e. This directly affects empirical examinations since cause and effect are inseparable. Moreover, some definitions might not even allow for an ex post declaration. Rindova and Kotha argue in their case study research that Yahoo! Nevertheless, the possibility of a loss seems not satisfactory as this implies that a firm that successfully transformed multiply times might not necessarily be able to repeat this in the future.

Thus, the attribution of dynamic capabilities ex post might not provide insides for future developments. There are of course conversations on dynamic capabilities that consider the major shortcomings and separate dynamic capabilities from a positive outcome, this study further refers to this group as group 2.

Arguably, the most prominent example here might be Winter He describes dynamic capabilities as a higher-order routine to change zero-level capabilities. Following Winter , dynamic capabilities are plainly one strategic option available to organizations in dynamic environments that might not lead to success at all. Ad-hoc problem solving, or resource- picking skills Makadok, could be alternatives. These conceptualizations neither suffer from tautology, nor from an inability to prove them empirically.

However, they might miss the very intent of the concept dynamic capabilities by Teece et al. The dynamic capability perspective's intent to extent the resource-based view that, although efficient in static environments, is less applicable to explain sustainable competitive advantage in regimes of rapid change.

The non-tautological definitions of group 2 thus miss the very purpose of dynamic capabilities. Hence, their additional value might remain limited as various other concepts already address flexibility, learning, and change, i.

In search for a hybrid, alternative definitions consider the existing controversy. This study refers to those conceptualizations as group 3. This may circumvent the loss of the concept's very intent, while apparently avoiding the tautology trap.

An example here is Helfat et al. The literature on dynamic capabilities appears thus subject to a trade-off between being either a tautological, causally not ascertainable in empirical investigations group 1 or being vague with limited strategic intent groups 2 and 3. Table 1 summarizes the groups of definitions of dynamic capabilities. Definitions of dynamic capabilities. A starting point for a systems theoretic perspective Luhmann, on dynamic capabilities is the fundamental distinction between a social system, such as an organization, and its environment.

In very basic terms, a social system is defined as being everything but the environment and vice versa. This distinction is primarily a difference of complexity with a lower level of complexity inside the system. In other words, the environment seems to be boundless and infinite from the system's perspective and the latter is unable to comprehend its surrounding in full scale and scope. Instead, a social system has to reduce complexity to constitute itself and to ensure its further existence through establishing and maintaining a difference or a boundary to its environment.

Nevertheless, the system still needs a sufficient although a lower degree of internal complexity to cope with challenges of its more complex environment Ashby, The reduction of environmental complexity is accomplishable through two distinct characteristics of social systems.

Drawing on basic insights from modern systems theory Luhmann, , organizations are regarded as social systems which are both self-referential and sense-processing in their very nature. Social systems are also sense-processing. Sense-processing and self-referentiality are closely intertwined: They represent an essentially subjective and self-descriptive stance resulting in a boundary demarcation that appears to be meaningful to the system. This ongoing process of social construction is inevitable and inescapable: Self-referential and sense-processing practices enable the system to act in world of infinite opportunities.

They support the selection of a few opportunities that appear to be meaningful to the system while they help to exclude a variety of other options. In other words, a set of reasonable possibilities for action is chosen at the expense of seemingly infinite others. Thereby, they reduce overwhelming environmental complexity to a feasible level from a system's perspective Luhmann, They differentiate the system from its environment since the former would not exist otherwise Aldrich, The maintenance of system borders necessarily implies a preservation of a complexity divide with a lower level of complexity inside the system.

Since an organization is unable to fully comprehend its boundless environment, interpretative practices are in place to permit the system to act. Thereby, the system is inevitably selective Luhmann, since it pursues only those action patterns that appear to be meaningful to itself.

Consequently, complexity reduction at the system's border involves the inherent risk of developing an inappropriate idea of the organizational environment. This generic problem of organizing is ultimately not resolvable. Paradoxically, selectivity also leads to potential blind spots , and to uncertainty in every kind of strategic action which constrains organizational action and harms organizational survival. Popularized by Porter as part of the competitor analysis, the contemporary management literature on competitive blind spots heavily draws on a psychological perspective, stressing the role of group perception and cognition e.

In a systems theoretic sense, competitive blind spots represent the necessarily ignorant nature of strategic action. This applies particularly to their underlying socially constructed distinctions on which their observations of reality and thus their collective sense and identity build on Luhmann, As generally stated above, selectivity enables the system to observe its environment in the first place but it also prevents the former from observing itself from an external perspective, or as Luhmann , p.

Whatever distinction is selected, others remain possible. Each cut highlights certain aspects of reality and obscures others.

Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: organizing for innovation and growth

Handbook on Knowledge Management pp Cite as. An expanded paradigm is needed to explain how competitive advantage is gained and held. However, winners in the global marketplace have been frms demonstrating timely responsiveness and rapid and flexible product innovation, along with the management capability to effectively coordinate and redeploy internal and external competences. First, it refers to the shifting character of the environment; second, it emphasizes the key role of strategic management in appropriately adapting, integrating, and re-configuring internal and external organizational skills, resources, and functional competences toward a changing environment. Only recently have researchers begun to focus on the specifics of developing firm-specific capabilities and the manner in which competences are renewed to respond to shifts in the business environment.

An expanded paradigm is needed to explain how competitive advantage is gained and held. However, winners in the global marketplace have been firms demonstrating timely responsiveness and rapid and flexible product innovation, along with the management capability to effectively coordinate and redeploy internal and external competences. First, it refers to the shifting character of the environment; second, it emphasizes the key role of strategic management in appropriately adapting, integrating, and re-configuring internal and external organizational skills, resources, and functional competences toward changing environment. The dynamic capabilities approach provides a coherent framework to integrate existing conceptual and empirical knowledge, and facilitate prescription. This paper argues that the competitive advan is tage of firms stems from dynamic capabilities rooted in high performance routines operating inside the firm, embedded in the firm's processes, and conditioned by its history. It offers dynamic capabilities as an emerging paradigm of the modern business firm that draws on multiple disciplines and advances, with the help of industry studies in the USA and elsewhere.

Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: organizing for innovation and growth

Skip to search form Skip to main content You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly. Teece and G. Pisano and A. Teece , G.

Teece , Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen. Dynamic capabilities can be distinguished from operational capabilities, which pertain to the current operations of an organization. The basic assumption of the dynamic capabilities framework is that core competencies should be used to modify short-term competitive positions that can be used to build longer-term competitive advantage.

The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge JIK focuses on how we gain knowledge through innovation and how knowledge encourages new forms of innovation. Not all innovation leads to knowledge. Only enduring innovation that can be generalized across multiple fields creates theory and knowledge.

The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms

Duplicate citations

Вокруг него бушевала настоящая буря, но в его глазах она увидела смирение. Губы Стратмора приоткрылись, произнеся последнее в его жизни слово: Сьюзан. Воздух, ворвавшийся в ТРАНСТЕКСТ, воспламенился. В ослепительной вспышке света коммандер Тревор Стратмор из человека превратился сначала в едва различимый силуэт, а затем в легенду. Взрывной волной Сьюзан внесло в кабинет Стратмора, и последним, что ей запомнилось, был обжигающий жар.

The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms

Лейтенант глубоко затянулся. - Долгая история. Чутье подсказывало Беккеру, что это открытие не сулит ему ничего хорошего. - Все равно расскажите. ГЛАВА 15 Сьюзан Флетчер расположилась за компьютерным терминалом Третьего узла.

Тремя этажами ниже дрожали и гудели резервные генераторы. Сьюзан знала, что где-то на дне этого погруженного в туман подземелья есть рубильник. Кроме того, она понимала, что времени почти не оставалось. Стратмор сидел наверху с береттой в руке.

Все повернулись к экрану, где над всем этим хаосом появилась надпись: ВВЕСТИ ПАРОЛЬ. 3 - Да! - скомандовал Фонтейн.  - Нажимайте. Сьюзан задержала дыхание и опустила палец на клавишу Ввод. Компьютер издал звуковой сигнал.

4 COMMENTS

Marjolaine A.

REPLY

Search this site.

Armanda P.

REPLY

Teece; Gary Pisano; Amy Shuen. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7. (​Aug., ), pp. Stable URL.

Wayde F.

REPLY

Abstract The dynamic capabilities framework analyzes the sources and methods of wealth creation and capture by private enterprise firms operating in.

Ona V.

REPLY

To browse Academia.

LEAVE A COMMENT